Plausible Deniability Warfare

Get A Free Precious Metals Consultation
https://sovereignadvisors.net/pages/seanmorgan/

Call Dr. Kirk Elliott at +1 720-605-3900

Transcript

0 (0s):
It's good to be here, John. And I'm so excited to hear the thoughts from Colonel Phil Waldron about this unrestricted unconventional warfare. That's unfolding right now, because that's really the theme for my segment today only I'm giving it a little bit of a different name. I'm calling it Plausible Deniability Warfare. And this is a phrase that I'm coining today. And I think it's going to start to make sense as I start to illustrate this kind of technique that both the good guys and the bad guys are using right now. And we refer to these ambiguous groups like the deep state and the white hats, because there are just so many different actors on the world stage.

0 (40s):
There are state actors, they're intelligence agencies, there's institutions like the media, and they're all at war with each other and they're all coordinating with each other. So it's an interesting and historic time to be alive. It's not the warfare from world war II. That's, it's a different game now.

1 (56s):
Oh, without question well said, well, let's get into this Plausible Deniability and the start connecting the dots for us. And it sounds very interesting.

0 (1m 6s):
Sure. Yeah. You know, the definition of Plausible Deniability is just the ability to deny that you're involved in an activity because there's no clear evidence to prove that you're involved. And so of course we all know that there's secretive and covert warfare going on around the world, but it's not always with people with uniforms. And I'm going to suggest to the audience today that many of the news events, the people just gloss over. And they just think that it's nothing, it's actually an operation. It's a, a plausible plausibly deniable covert operation.

0 (1m 47s):
And so a good example of this as far as psychological operation would be que and on. And this seems to be a positive operation from the white hats are the good actors, but they officially deny that they're involved while they give plenty of hints that they are actually involved. So if we'll just take a look on the screen about how Mike Pence claimed that he had never even heard of QA. I mean, this is by the time that, you know, there had already been millions of que and non supporters and the mainstream media had been doing hit piece after hit piece and all of the biggest newspapers like the Washington post and the New York times, and yet Mike Pence never read any of those articles.

0 (2m 29s):
He never heard of que and on for any of the millions of supporters of his administration. So that's an interesting thing that he just it's, it's an easy thing to just deny like, oh, I never even heard of it. And Trump that the same thing, let's take a look at the, the next thing on the screen, which would be the guardian article where Trump says, you know, he doesn't know much about you and on he's, he's heard of it, but he doesn't really know anything about it. It's just the line that he kept on saying over and over again. And then the media, they got really frustrated with that. They're like, what you mean? You don't know much about it. We've been reporting on non-stop. How could you not know anything about it? He's like, well, I've got better, bigger things on my plate than to worry about these conspiracy theories. And so, you know, that's just a good example of how you can just deny it it's the Plausible Deniability.

0 (3m 16s):
And that was kind of the whole point of the queue operation that's they could share intelligence that was, you know, supposedly insider information, but they could do it in a way which wouldn't break the security laws. So, so that's, that's a psychological operation, but I'm going to talk about how this actually gets kinetic. You know, this is ends up being real warfare, but it just doesn't look like

1 (3m 42s):
Real warfare. Welcome back, Sean. Hey, stay away from that 17th left and I don't want you to disappear on us again. I thanks for being here, Sean Colonel. Phil Waldron.

0 (3m 53s):
Yes. Thank you, Colonel. It's so great to meet you. I was, I did have a question for you. I know that you have technical expertise in, and you have a lot of knowledge about the election fraud and the, the technical aspects of it. And I think for, for the average American, it's hard to separate the signal from the noise. You know, we've heard that Italy was involved, that Venezuela was involved, the China was involved, but we don't have any like really centralized place resource that we can go to get the evidence. So I was wondering if you had any additional resources that you, maybe you didn't mention on today's show that you might want to recommend to, to people to look at.

2 (4m 32s):
We don't another initiative that a, the governor Abbott has entertained, had a meeting with him a couple of Thursdays ago. I'm not sure what the date is about creating outside of the, the, the federal government outside of the EAC and outside of the federally approved voting laboratories on election integrity center of excellence, a nonpartisan academically focused and, and reviewed effort to be a repository, a resource for other states to get testing, to get training, to understand background, to understand history, to do, you know, vetted financial financial record research.

2 (5m 17s):
So that's a, a big effort that I'm, I'm working with a couple of representatives here in Texas. And as long with the governor Abbott, his staff and Lieutenant governor and his staff to get established, it's really, I'm such a big project for even a small team. We're we're in the, the execution trap we're caught and woefully inadequate, really trying to work with up to a dozen states right now, to help and various phases of, of election audits and recommendations for their, their legislative sessions. How, how can they make better choices? How can they make better local law?

2 (5m 58s):
And we're, we're just we're overrun. And it, it's, it's a great feeling that folks are trying to reach out Louisiana. Right now, we're working with the secretary of state <inaudible> and several, the senators have been reaching out, back and forth with some other citizens groups and trying to save expanding money. There, there are options that we have by the mark. Fincham mentioned a, a serialized paper ballot with the blockchain system, like votes Voat Z system. And that basically provide a bifurcated system, the paper ballot system, as well as a blockchain verified transactional data that costs instead of, you know, a hundred, I think they're, they're going to spend a hundred million dollars on electronic voting systems.

2 (6m 50s):
They could spend less than $10 million get a doubly secure process. And I explained it like this. I said, in your wallet or your money clip, you've got tens, twenties, ones, fives. You know, some of you big spenders, you know, you give us some fifties and hundreds in there, but every one of those are serialized. And they've got anti-counterfeit measures in place to, in there by treasury department. And every time they go through a bank, they're scanned. So the treasury department knows where the twenties, the 20 that's in your pocket. As soon as you spend it, when it gets to a bank, they're going to know where it is and they're going to track it. The same concept can work in paper, ballots, precinct level voting. If you print the ballots up, you put anti-counterfeiting measures in and you have serialized numbers.

2 (7m 34s):
They're not directly numerically serialized, but at the end of the day, the voting precinct judge says I had 10,000 people vote. I had a total of 13,000 ballots. I had a thousand spoil ballots and 500 absentee ballots. Here's my votes. Here's my spoil ballots. Here's my blank ballots. It didn't turn in. It was just like balancing a checkbook. They know 100%, there are no other ballots. And they they're checking the, the, the, the anti-counterfeit measures. So it's simple. It's not hard. The reason it's hard is because politicians want to take advantage of the system that was made four for, for being rigged.

2 (8m 16s):
And I'm, you know, I, I am conservative. I'm a constitutionalist, but if there's a crooked Republican or a crooked Democrat, they are the swing from the same tree. I don't, I don't, I don't like crooked politicians at all. And if you've benefited from cheating on election day, you're violating my civil right's and the civil rights of everyone else in the, in the voting population. And that's not acceptable.

0 (8m 44s):
So we have the tools, we have the solutions, we just need to implement them. I'm curious about the, the problem that you mentioned of these basically terror cells have the, the cartels working infiltrating into the United States. And it seems like these democratic run cities with the sanctuary city status is the kind of a way of coordinating with them because it gives them cover. Do you have any, any thoughts or solutions related to that?

2 (9m 14s):
Again, we've got to control the borders and have a, you know, a deportation program. There is a path to citizenship. There is a legal path to citizenship where the term illegal alien means something. I'm sorry. It may not be politically correct for somebody, but if you go outside of the legal process, you are illegal. You are extra legal. If you go through the legal process, like I know tons of folks who have done that, they have had a long journey and a lot of work for a lot of paperwork. A lot of waiting, you know, waiting on are, are highly efficient, bureaucratic systems to, to actually work in the course.

2 (9m 56s):
And so if, if you are committed and you want to assimilate to be an American, just like Teddy Roosevelt said that to me is a solution. It's not, it's, it's not new. It doesn't have to be new. It's an old idea, but it's still relevant. So yes, if you're not a, a us citizen, you gotta have some type of documentation. You gotta have some type of, you know, registration that you're here for this amount of time. Yes. If there's, if there are workers needed, have a work visa program, you have, you've got an ID. This is an ID that gives you these limited privileges of residing here in the U S but a, a non-citizen.

2 (10m 42s):
And we've got, we've got a separate that, that distinction of being an American citizen, I'm very, very proud of being an American citizen. People all over the world, want to migrate to America, become American citizens. So it was highly desirous. And so it, yeah, anything worth getting is worth effort. So do it the right way, do it the legal way and not the extra legal way or the illegal way. And if you're illegal, then you either rectify it or you get sent back to your country,

1 (11m 17s):
Amazing guests. And I really hope you'll come back on the show because the world's gonna change. I believe the, the next several months. And I'd love to have you weigh in on the circumstances we find ourselves in at that time, would you be open to, to, to an invitation,

2 (11m 33s):
Happy to thank you for having me. Thank you.

1 (11m 36s):
You bet. And a couple of things, as we close out, are you doing any public speaking? How can people follow you online and how can people attend the places that you might be speaking at?

2 (11m 49s):
So I spent the greater part of my adult life for the last part, my military career being invisible. So I don't have a website. I think, I think there's an old Facebook page and some LinkedIn stuff, but I really don't ever use it or check in on it. You know, I'll try to get better at that, but I don't, that's not one of my, I don't really care. What are the things that drive

1 (12m 20s):
You open? Are you open to invitations once you have all the information to speak at public events? B and the reason I ask is there's an organization here in Florida in Sarasota that is holding, I think it's 607th annual conference. And this year it's expected to build a 2000 seat arena. And I've been asked to help organize that and to be a media partner, this might be in October, but would we be able to reach out to you and at least extended invitation too, for you to be on the panel of speakers?

2 (12m 55s):
Sure. I'll, I'll try to juggle it in, you know, for me it's mission first. So if I'm, if I can work with a group of senators or work with a, you know, a legislator or a group of folks doing an audit somewhere, mission goes, first I try to do is to get the word out to the people as often as I can. And I will definitely still try to do that, but I got to get the work done first.

1 (13m 22s):
Thank you. Excuse me, pardon me? I'm at the talent and have a cough people. So me as COVID, excuse me, folks, people have had cold for centuries, you know, but anyway, we gotta wrap up two quick questions and I know these could be long answers, but I know you have the ability to just give us a concise answer. Lieutenant Colonel, Phil president, Trump's greatest accomplishment from your perspective,

2 (13m 51s):
Returning the voice of the people to the white house.

1 (13m 58s):
Beautiful. Now the important, I mean, that's, that's, that's, what's supposed to happen. And last question, as we wrap up our program, what do you feel is the greatest threat facing America today?

2 (14m 14s):
Apathy and lack of knowledge about what our country is all about, what the, the fact that our kids don't know American history, that they don't know about the founders that they don't know about, the Federalist papers that they don't know about the constitution. They don't know about the, the declaration of independence to Gettysburg address the fights, the, that, you know, where we lost millions of Americans to retain and protect the Republic. And then what, you know, they don't, they don't know civics. You know, you see folks that are so involved in their phones and social media apps and the here and now that they've lost context, they've lost what the, the ideals and the principles that our country was built on.

2 (15m 13s):
And the, the, the blood and my brothers and my sisters and those warriors who have gone before me that made it possible. And that's really my, my biggest fear.

1 (15m 27s):
Well, thank you. We're closing out our show. Thank you very much, Sean Morgan, The Sean Morgan Report, Shontel joined me tomorrow on making sense of the matter is with James VIG, Alexandra, Bruce, and Kirstin w YouTube and author Colonel Phil work. And you've been an amazing guest. Really the information you've provided is extremely valuable and important because people are having a tough time detecting truth from lies and the age of fake news. And you brought it home to us on some critically important subjects. And we salute you, sir, and thank you for your continued service to this country. Thank you very much.