Trump, Vaccines, and UFOs

Keep me on the front lines of the digital battlefield by supporting my work here : https://donorbox.org/seanmorganreport

This episode was sponsored by Sovereign Advisors Get a Free Gold Consultation: Call Dr. Kirk Elliott at +1 720-605-3900 https://sovereignadvisors.net/pages/seanmorgan/

Transcript

1 (33s):
Welcome to the Sean Morgan, your reports. I'm your host, Sean Morgan. We have a great show for you today. We're going to be interviewing Paul Ferber and Jim Cutler about the strategy between the white hats and the deep states about this increasing military escalations how the GOP seems to be on the offense now and how Trump has new thing to say about vaccines for kids. So let's hear a word from our sponsors, sovereign advisors, and we'll be right back. Gold

2 (1m 0s):
Is near all time highs. Has it reached this peak? Did you miss the boat? No, I don't think so. The exploding debt changing the interest rate cycle political and economic turmoil have caused the current move in gold and those things are getting worse. In fact, Citibank projected gold to hit $3,000 an ounce over the next 12 to 18 months. I encourage you to protect and grow your investment portfolio with gold. I trust Dr. Kirk Elliott with sovereign advisors with over 25 years of experience in two PhDs. Kirk Elliott is the best, the best in the industry. Call his office at (720) 605-3900. And tell him, Sean Morgan sent you. We're just click on the link and the description to get that free consultation.

1 (1m 43s):
All right, welcome back everybody. Yeah, let's bring on the three panel. I'm going to interview Paula and Jim here. We can all speak together. So yeah, Paul Ferber, you know, we met a while back. It must have been almost a year ago. I was following you on Twitter, Paul, and you were so outspoken about things that really inspired me to be more outspoken myself and led me on this journey of being an independent journalist. So thank you for that, Paul and Paul, you, maybe you can introduce yourself about how you got involved with the whole Q thing and you ended up writing a book about it.

3 (2m 21s):
Hi, Sean. Great to talk to you again. Yes, I, I got involved by accident. I was hanging around on four Chan looking for good intelligence leads as you do. And I came across the sky who was dropping amazing stuff. And within a few weeks I was running the board on nature and where he was dropping. So yeah, it was a bit of a, a bit of a whirlwind introduction there. And since then, I've just been speaking out on social media and all my own website about I'm the massive changes we're seeing in the world geopolitically. And as part of that, I wrote a book inside the greatest intelligence drop in history and that's available free on my website.

3 (3m 9s):
So you can download it and see for yourself.

1 (3m 13s):
It's an amazing book, actually. I it's one of the best ones out there about que and on. And you have an investigation, investigative journalists. Well, you were a tech journalist back in the day. Is that right?

3 (3m 27s):
Yes, that's true. That's correct. I've always looked up to the investigative journalists. They are the real journos in my book. So, you know, the guys like the Seymour Hersh and Gary Webb and you know, those guys who really dug behind the scenes before there was no internet, they trolled the data, the work they put in the way they put in the hours that trolled the board and they went and talked to people. So I've always had a, an admiration for that class of journey and it was nice to kind of join their ranks if only have the very bottom with, and in a niche that I myself for skilled at, which was, you know, digging up Intel on the message boards like four Chan and eight Chan.

1 (4m 10s):
Yes. And you are working in the technology industry right now. And Jim is retired from being the CEO and founder of a software companies. And I used to work and in the tech industry as well. So we all have something in common. I think that's what brought all three of us curious minds onto the internet to start researching this Q thing. And now it's kind of led us down this path of analyzing geopolitics. Jim, I'll just do a quick intro if people are tuning in. And just for the first time, Jim is my cohost. You know, Jim has been doing this podcast with me for a year and you know, he's just has a great mind.

1 (4m 52s):
And I like the way he thinks about things. He has a great heart wants to help people in the great awakening and, and you know, so that's Jim and I are just having these conversations every Friday on AmericanMediaPeriscope dot net. And now we're inviting Paul along for the ride. So Jim, anything you wanted to say about some of the breaking things like Trump talking about vaccines are not necessary for kids?

3 (5m 16s):
Well, I think what we're seeing is just simply a continuum. And as we follow along again, from the very beginning, when they first started putting information out on four Chan, there's been a very much a consistent lo have information. And when I say that, of course, we all here know that there are a great deal of caveats with regard to what our optics, what is, you know, good information, what is misdirection and so on and so forth, all part and parcel to how this information war is being waged.

3 (5m 58s):
So for me, you know, as a researcher and someone who's been familiar with the vaccination problems or many years now, a, the sources of information that I use in terms of adverse effects, databases like VARs and so forth, provide a ream of information that anyone can access and therefore can see the trendline or these kinds of medications and drugs putting the COVID-19 vaccine, which is actually technically not a vaccine.

3 (6m 39s):
It's a, it's an M RNA modifier in a whole category by itself. So we knew, I knew, and I know we all knew that what the reality was about these vaccines, but of course, Trump and the team are putting out information that appears to be countered to that. And this is where a lot of this conversation that we have is very important to keep our listeners in line with what is actually the process here, as opposed to what it appears at face value.

1 (7m 19s):
Yes. You know, Trump has never been a pro-vaccine for, you know, we've got his tweet history for decades. He's been very close with Bobby Kennedy Jr. Who was the most outspoken, you know, vaccine safety advocates in the world almost had him in the administration in fact, and I'm. And so Trump knows, he knows the deep state has been messing around with, you know, pumping people with all types of bad stuff through the vaccines for a long time. And, and so Trump had some type of advanced strategy regarding taking it over the vaccine development and distribution.

1 (7m 60s):
I don't know what that strategy is. It's probably pretty complex. It seems to be that there are some batches that are just saline solution as we've seen in the news and Ohio, but it's kind of disturbing that there's 50% of the Republican base that has taking the vaccine. It's even disturbing to me that some journalists that I really, really admire like Brian Kates and Duane Kates and the people over on social quad virum they are now starting to become Provax. And they're saying that you can't be pro-Trump and anti-vax at the same time, they say it's a contradiction.

1 (8m 41s):
They say that we're basically blowing Trump's greatest accomplishment. If we say that the vaccine is bad and they claim that we are in the alternative news are putting out misinformation about vaccine safety. And for me, it's like every single day more stuff comes out about this vaccine. That's not a vaccine it's gene therapy. And for example, we had the British airways pilots, four of them died after the vaccine recently, that was a big shocker. But the point is that these big pharma companies have no legal liability. They're completely shielded by the government for this.

1 (9m 23s):
There have been no long-term human trials. We've never had an MRN, a vaccine ever. And these people, these Trump supporters, these supposed and journalists who are just becoming, you know, blind to Trump cheerleaders, aren't looking deeper at this, in my opinion. So, Paul, what's your response to everything I just said.

3 (9m 47s):
Yeah. You make some very good points. They shown, I, I find it almost impossible to trust anything anybody says about the vaccine many years ago, I read an outstanding book called that farmer by Ben Goldacre, which I think is a 2017, 2009 title, which outlined all of the shady stuff that the big pharma companies or up to, and that has colored in my opinion of them for a long time. And I think quite rightly Trump, I think made it perfectly clear during his presidency that getting the vaccine was optional.

3 (10m 27s):
But on the other hand, he did push, you know, the, he did push the adoption of vaccinations and the manufacturer have them. And I think we also have to, we also have to differentiate between the different ones. As you know, I do a lot of research on the chance and just, you know, that every day there's a new thread on Corona virus, general, which has a breakdown of all the, of all the vaccines. And they have, they have a ranking by known safety, you know, with BCG at the top, know the VAX, the in J and J then Sputnik, then AstraZeneca, then, you know, rot at the bottom.

3 (11m 16s):
The, you know, the Pfizer, my donor's stuff with the, the AMR night and that's poles ranking from the M from the pace that I'm reading. Now, my members of my own family have taken the fight, the effects, and they're fine, but they not. I'm living in South Africa. So I'm certain that different batches have been prepared for different territory's the Corona Chan by itself varies so wildly between race, age, population, group six obesity level, the level of health care that, you know, it's almost impossible to study in the wild.

3 (12m 0s):
It varies by taxi route as my own wife discovered she's she's on the front line of Corona treatment here in South Africa. She has to look off to the factory of 300 workers. And <inaudible> because going through a nasty third wave right now, similar to India, but just not, not quite as many numbers. So I don't trust anybody about the vacs. I don't trust. And I certainly don't trust the authorities, but I always come back to the principle that they all know right answers when you're dealing with a buyer with him, it's just, it's a very difficult situation. I'm certainly not getting the VAX, but I, I'm not gonna throw anything at somebody who wants to the, yeah, it's a hard one.

1 (12m 48s):
You know, I was talking to my mother recently and she, she kind of came to the same conclusion that it was hard to sift through all the data and all the information sources and come to any conclusion. And I, I, what I told her was, well, you basically have two camps. You have the big pharma camp that, that is basically distributing their talking points to the medical tyranny, the low them and the government bureaucrats and the media apparatus. So that's one camp and, you know, that's the one camp I just will never trust because, you know, they're minting new billionaires from the profits off of this thing.

1 (13m 31s):
And they, their incentive is in the wrong place. And they've lied to us before about vaccines. So I'm never, ever going to believe them. And then you've got the other camp, you know, you've got Dr. Tenpenny and Dr. Northrup and all of these doctors that risk their medical license risk, the reputation they're being targeted. They're being, you know, smeared, they're taking every risk. You can imagine their own life is at risk for speaking out about their own research and their own views. And to me, that's the camp I'm going to listen to it. They don't all agree with each other. It's not all one unified theory, but it's the side I'm going to listen to more than the big pharma side.

1 (14m 13s):
And have we ever, have we ever isolated this virus, you know, is the medical community and consensus on this thing that we even know what it is and what it looks like, Jim, what are your thoughts?

3 (14m 28s):
Well, when it comes to isolating a virus, that's a very specific and difficult process. And the standpoint of what is technically possible, then the answer is yes, it's been isolated because those who work on it, in other words, AOCI, and the team that he had put together to do gain of function research, they know exactly what's in this thing. So to say that it's not available at all would be somewhat incorrect, just simply from the standpoint of what is science is capable of doing. But when you look at the organizations and institutions who have gone to the CDC and asked for that information, they've been patently refused.

3 (15m 19s):
So there's a lawsuit right there. When the CDC just refuses to provide this information that must be available in order for things like testing kits and ECR kids and whatnot to be developed. So either they're lying or somebody like, and this is the problem that we have when two organizations, both working together, put out two separate pieces of information that are in Congress, then you have to stop and say, what the hell is going on another point I want to make, and this is just simply going through patents that are attached to pharmacological organizations.

3 (16m 4s):
You will find a number of patents that demonstrate and interest in gene targeting when it comes to pharmaceuticals. In other words, they're trying to manufacture, develop and manufacture a pharmacological substances that actually behave differently depending on your genomic makeup. So, so they want to target different cultures with a particular substance. We'll call it a vaccine for the moment so that it has, it targets that culture. And it can provide, you know, different responses to people depending on their genome.

3 (16m 51s):
So knowing that all of those things exist. And again, patents that have been filed are very important because they demonstrate a public statement to the world saying, yes, we're interested in this. We're interested in making money in this. We are interested in owning this technology. So it says a lot about the organization that files these patents. So it would not surprise me at all. I cannot say this for you research. And so I want to make that clear, but again, when you know that the technology exists, the patents exist, the opportunity to make money exists.

3 (17m 34s):
Then it's just that tiny step through the internet, the limitation of that technology. And in this case, in the, in the pharmacology industry. So the people who work on gain of function on viruses have those incentives right there in front of them. And considering that their motivation is profit. I have a hard time believing that they're not engaging at least in some way in bringing those two things together.

1 (18m 7s):
Let me read to you guys because well, first of all, address what Paul said that his, some of his family members had the vaccine and they're fine. You know, I've had a family member to family members had the vaccine and they seem to be fine, but my father did cough up a blood clot and he is the heart, a heart patient. So that's disturbing and my mother did not get vaccinated. And she started getting nosebleeds as soon as my father got vaccinated. So that's the whole shedding theory that, that, you know, these doctors have been talking about. But so then Mike Adams on his podcast is talking about how there could be latent elements in these vaccines that could be activated later by different constituents, like maybe additional vaccines or by, you know, who knows what else, because we could be dealing with nanotechnology.

1 (19m 7s):
And the whole magnetic thing is, is disturbing and weird. But I want to just read the, the email from two Dr. Fowchee, the, the, the subject line Corona virus, bio weapon, production method. Hello, Anthony. This is how the virus was created. Inter Veyron fusion. The HIV was mixed with 100, 1000 mg of HIV particles incorporating ASL V a envelope, SARS COVID protein. So they just, can you believe that that email exists, that the, we have an email to Dr. Fowchee that says Corona virus, bio weapon, production method, and includes snippets of HIV in it. I mean, this is not exactly a smoking gun that the Corona virus that was leaked was the specific strain, which is what the fact checkers are all set screaming.

1 (19m 58s):
You know, they're all like, no, no, you can't believe every email you read from Dr. Fowchee. I mean, it doesn't mean its the same Corona virus. We've got millions of Corona viruses. And the point is they were doing experimental research on a Corona virus, mixed with HIV and they call it a bio weapon. And the us was funding the exact lab where the epicenter of the release was. So we're just trying to put, I mean take an idiot, not to put the dots together. So Paul, what's your response?

3 (20m 28s):
Well, if you remember the last January, February, March, everyone who said, who said this, who pointed out what was plainly obvious that this was the bio weapon that was, you know, probably created by the Chinese. And probably there was an Indian paper that came out that said, sorry, gods. But that looks like there's HIV and the spike protein, we were all called conspiracy theorists. Now it seems to be plain to everyone that this is the bio weapon and yes, that incorporates elements of HIV and the spike protein and that it was created by China with some technological help from lab's in the U S research and gain a function.

3 (21m 15s):
So yeah. And all it takes for a conspiracy theory to become truth. These days is about what about a year a year's wait.

1 (21m 25s):
Yeah. And it's, it's a lot of, it takes a lot of patients for Patriots to be willing to wait that timeline. But I have to be reminded by Jim usually that the Patriots have their timeline and they, they prefer to wait things out and to let them boomerang back and bite the deep state in the ass, you know, later on. And that's what we're seeing with January 6th right now with the so-called insurrection where, you know, Donald Trump probably knew ahead of time that they had some kind of operation planned, probably why he delayed his speech that day to mess up their timeline, but they let that happen. They let <inaudible> and BLM and the FBI infiltrate Trump supporters and militias and do that operation.

1 (22m 11s):
They just let that happen. And so just like they basically let a lot of things happen, let the election steel happen, let the bio weapon happen. This has been the art of war tactic that Trump and his allies have been using. And you know, it does end up working, you know, we've seen how everything they tried to stick against Trump doesn't stick like the, for impeachment hoax and the Mueller hoax and the second impeachment hoax and everything just, it doesn't work and who looks bad now, it's not Trump. It's Fowchee. Right.

1 (22m 51s):
So, you know, it's the FBI, that's going to look like Fowchee here in a couple of weeks when this whole January 6th thing blows up even more. Luckily we have people like Tucker Carlos and who are blowing, but you know, who's blowing the origin of COVID-19 it's Jon Stewart talking to Stephen Colbert. So John Stewart, you know, he's retired, but he used to be the mouthpiece for the deep states in the form of a comedy. And he goes on to his replacement's show, Stephen Colbert where, and he says, well, yeah, that's awesome. That's the origin of COVID-19 is from that level for Biolab and, and move on China and Stephen Colbert pushes value, Leo, you know, what are you talking about here?

1 (23m 36s):
That's crazy conspiracy. And John's like, oh really? So if there was like a, a leak of chocolatey goodness near Hershey, Pennsylvania, you wouldn't think it came from the chocolate factory. So John, he was like the guy who had the job to start seeding this new narrative and wake up people on the left. And I was surprised that he was allowed to say that on that program. Right. Because you would think if the deep state and control of everything, then they wouldn't let John say that on air. So that makes me think that it wasn't the deep state that had didn't do that. And you know, so what are you, what are your thoughts on that, Jim?

3 (24m 20s):
Well, I think again, it's important to go back to the very beginning and take certain things to heart. One of those, and this is a big one for me is that the white hats control the NSA. Now when a governmental organization or any organization wants to control narrative, they have the control data. And so there's things that they are going to want to push out to the public. And there are things that they're going to want to hold on two and keep secret. Before 2016, they had a very solid control over the things they wanted to keep secret that ended when Trump was elected and you could see how it ended and you can see the, the ways that it was ending.

3 (25m 7s):
Suddenly information's coming out that before we would have never known about, and that would have given those who control that information, all of the power and controlling the NSA clearly and demonstratively was what the white hats were using to throw a monkey wrench in the narrative. So if the deep state was trying to say one thing, all Trump and his people had to do was push out the opposite. And that destroys the continuity of the narrative at the deep state is trying to hold on two and basically a big word in this industry or in this back and forth kind of informational warfare is noise.

3 (25m 55s):
The use of noise is very powerful because you can destroy a cohesive narrative simply by interjecting noise, whatever that may be oppositional, information information have the same bill only slightly different. That just unbalances the narrative and things like that. So that's what I look at it. And that's what I've learned to look for when I'm listening to these narratives streams. And it's clear to me that now the deep state, they just can't maintain cohesive grip on the narratives and the Trump administration on the white hats.

3 (26m 38s):
Just keep holding the rug out from under them in various ways. And they're all effective. And basically there's nothing the deep state can do about it. It, again, this is all about us, all about the people. You know, I, I often refer to that meme of Trump, a picture of Trump with him saying, it's not me thereafter, it's you. And I'm just in the way. And that's a very, very powerful statement. People have no idea how powerful that really is. And so that's the thing that I keep looking at and why I can look at Trump saying, you know, I made vaccines happen.

3 (27m 19s):
It was me. I brought them out. That is all about ripping that narrative rug out from under the deep state. And while yes, there's going to be collateral damage. We also have the push out of information on hydroxy chloroquine and the other very, very effective therapies for this particular form of, of SARS. That for those who are paying attention, those who are listening are going to hear that and go, I'm never going to touch those vaccines because I know there's good ways to deal with this where I don't have to do something that's so egregious and so invasive to my body.

3 (28m 1s):
And so that again, for those who were paying attention, they have useful information to have to work with.

1 (28m 10s):
It's like Trump has a crystal ball for him to have known so early. The hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment. And here we go, one year later, we just have been collecting data for a whole year. And it's sure enough, I'm the reason why the deep state did not want that out there is because it was such an effective treatment. So Jim, you mentioned the idea that the white house control the NSA, and this is a foreign idea to people who have never heard of que and on and the Q drops. But if you guys go to Q and on.pub and start sifting through the 5,000 posts, you're going to find some photographs and things like that, that Q posted to prove that they have the, you know, a proprietary access to peoples private phone information and so forth.

1 (28m 60s):
There's even like a S well, there's just many times the Q has mentioned, Hey, you know, when you guys went to Epstein island, you brought your phones on their, and what we see and hear everything like it's just this recurring theme many, many times. And when you think about the deep state versus the white hats, it really is this, this battle between two sides. And there, there access to weapons of different source, especially information. And this information can be seeded into the public in different ways. And so the NSA can't just, you know, do an emergency broadcast everyone's phone. Well, maybe they can, but they're choosing not to they're perhaps to work through WikiLeaks or in, and that's what seemed to be what happened in the 2016 election, or perhaps they have a certain partner in a computer repair shop in Delaware that had the hunter Biden's laptop by coincidence or judicial watch did freedom of information act, request for Fowchee, the emails and miraculously a year later at the right timing, they all came out.

1 (30m 10s):
So there are these different, you know, players, trusted sources that perhaps are used to see this narrative, a specific timing. And Paul, I want to ask you about this timing June 26. I believe it is when not only our, the audits going to be wrapped up in Arizona, but the federal government's going to do and massive UFO disclosure and people are pointing out that the deep state is doing all types of trying to get ahead of this UFO story and frame it the way they want to JJ Abrams is releasing an HBO special at the same time. So Patriot stormy, Patriot, Joe is an a non-research for that I follow.

1 (30m 54s):
And he said, he, he just wanted to remind people, Hey, Arizona audits, UFO disclosure happening at the same time, you know, Patriots chose that schedule. The deep state didn't choose that schedule. So Paula, and any thoughts on that?

3 (31m 10s):
Yeah, there's <inaudible>, as Jim said, the NSA has been controlling a lot of information release, and he's absolutely right about that. Although remember that it was even before the 2016 election, the NSA was forcing the hand of other of other agencies in the administration. You remember the cue told us that Admiral Rogers was the one who took, who, who gave the order to record bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac at Phoenix. And then four showed that recording to James Connie. I mean, I expect that, you know, the NSA actually died lunches jet, or can't remember who went where I think lunch went to the bills yet.

3 (31m 57s):
And, and Hillary joined by video conference. I think that the Rogers then go into James Comey and forced him to reopen the email case based on the recording, which was almost certainly bill and Hillary offering lynched the, the a C on the Supreme court and exchange for her dropping in the e-mail case. So, yeah, and what we're seeing now is just a continuation of various players on both sides, releasing what they can and suppressing what they can you have for disclosure. It's fascinating, we've known it's been coming for a while that the federal government is acknowledging that UFO's exist and I'm all for work, life exists.

3 (32m 41s):
And that hidden tech, all the stuff exists that's being kept for us for decades. I have, as, you know, some of my Wildman way outsourced on the channel, tell me that, ah, the space for us, the real space for us has had a moon, you know, has had bases on the Saturn's moons for 30, 40 years. Yeah. That's the kind of thing that is just outrageous and blows people's minds. But as we can, I, you know, this footage cannot be denied and it's footage from military sources that's being revealed to us. I believe that the, the, the rollout is to make it just to disorientate as many people as possible because yeah, finding out that aliens exist in UFO's exist and will be disorientating to a lot of people, but who exactly is trying to push it and who's pushing up against it is, is kind of hard to say until after the fact it's, it's certainly these kinds of things have to be gently introduced to make many people the conscious all be dumped on our lap.

3 (33m 52s):
So we've seen, that's why it's been a gradual, it's been a gradual process, but we're definitely heading to, you know, things are coming to a hit at the end of the smart, like you say, the 26th is when the UFO reporters out, the 26 is when the, the audit side and Arizona are finished. And my sources telling me that it's just, you know, the, the, the, the, the amount of rampant fraught, because just ridiculous. And then soon after that, Trump is going to visit the border with the governor Abbott of Texas. And a couple of days after that the New York is gonna drop the so-called and documents that, you know, prove the Trump was doing something illegal.

3 (34m 39s):
So this there's definitely a, it's definitely a sort of a head of steam building up into, to all these events and how they interact is going to be quite fascinating to watch.

1 (34m 52s):
Yes, this reminds me, and many times when we were following the Q drops, when Q was saying, ah, the deep state thinks something's going to come out on this day, but it's actually going to come out on another day and it's this constant, you know, back and forth. Can the deep state do a false flag operation or have a, a state funeral at the same time as you know, to try to take over the airways. So, yes, I believe that this is what's going on right now between the deep state and the white hats. There's this race to figure out when are these disclosures going to happen and what can the deep state do to distract? Because that's all they can do is distract.

1 (35m 33s):
They can't, you know, avoid it, it's going to happen. They, they might try to pull like a shutdown, like shut down the, the, the net or the grid or whatever, but that's just a delay tactic. So Jim, we're running out of time. I'll give you the closing thoughts and we'll see you guys next time Friday at 5:30 PM, Eastern on AmericanMediaPeriscope dot net.

3 (35m 58s):
Cool. And thank you again for having me on this is a very deep and the important discussion when it comes to the distraction of the UFO question, I can draw upon my relationships with both John Mack at Harvard and Stephen Greer have the discloser project, both people I have spoken with and worked with on the projects that they're involved with. And I can tell you from those personable personal interactions that the whole UFO question is absolutely not in the hands of the U S government. Now, it is true that there are various factions of UFO entities out there.

3 (36m 41s):
And of course, that information is widely available from many sources, not just John and Steven, but it is also true that if, if alien intelligence wants to make their presence known, they're going to make it known. It had nothing to do with anybody else. And whether or not you as an individual have an experience or not is outside of your control. So I want to assure everybody from everything I have research and, and understood is that that's, that's completely in the hands of the alien entities who happened to be in our dimension and in our airspace, in our, you know, space.

3 (37m 25s):
So whether or not the deep state thinks that is at all, something that is useful to them is solely up to them and they will do it if they think it's useful. Again, it's, it's noise on their part to try to distract from what is happening on the part of the white hats, but it's doomed to failure. Whether they try to use it in a technological way, or whether they try to use it in a psychological way, they don't have enough the handle on that subject and those beings to make use of it in any kind of real fundamental way.

3 (38m 5s):
And so I see that. And, and particularly when I see the rhetoric coming out and the, the images that they're using this stuff is so old. And so campy it's, it's absurd. And it's really more of an aspect of humor for me than anything else, because it's, it's so ridiculous, but people are going to be introduced to this stuff in a way that may upset, made the stabilize him and the deep state may find that useful. We'll see what happens.

1 (38m 42s):
Yeah. The deep state has been programming us for a generation to think that aliens are aggressive and have advanced technology they're going to use against us and all of these ideas. But I have a feeling that if there are off world, you know, civilizations, that there are an equal, if not greater amount of good advanced civilizations, as there are bad ones. So I have a feeling this isn't just the white house versus the deep state on earth. I have the feeling that there are, you know, entities on both sides of this. And this is like a whole big battle for earth going on. I guess we'll have to wait until June 26 to get some details, but, you know, the deep state keeps on saying, oh, there's no way that, you know, this techno, they're just trying to put limitations on us in our ability to interpret this information about the technology aspect.

1 (39m 36s):
And so I look forward to people's minds being blown, to be honest. Well, thank you for joining and Paul, you have that free book about que and on and on Paul ferber.net. Jim, you have your blog on the theory. You'll see where people can learn about your journey sailing around the world, and people can go get my free email report, breaking news analysis at, at Sean Morgan report.com and join us here every Friday at 5:00 PM. Eastern on AmericanMediaPeriscope dot net. God bless everyone. Bye bye.

0 (40m 8s):
Thanks. <inaudible>.